I write about science and international development (broadly defined).Follow
Nov 26, 2019,05:57pm EST
This article is more than 4 years old.
High-level nuclear waste consists largely of spent fuel from nuclear reactors. Though it makes up a small proportion of overall waste volumes, it accounts for the majority of radioactivity. This most potent form of nuclear waste, according to some, needs to be safely stored for up to a million years. Yes, 1 million years – in other words, a far longer stretch of time than the period since Neanderthals cropped up. This is an estimate of the length of time needed to ensure radioactive decay.
Yet existing and planned nuclear waste sites operate on much shorter timeframes: often 10,000 or 100,000 years. These are still such unimaginably vast lengths of time that regulatory authorities decide on them, in part, based on how long ice ages are expected to last. To some extent all of these figures are little better than educated guesses.
They’re also such mind-bogglingly long periods that in 1981, the US Department of Energy established the Human Interference Task Force to devise ways to warn future generations of the dangerous contents of nuclear repositories. This was a challenging task then, and nuclear semiotics remains the stuff of science fiction. Written language has only existed for about 5,500 years, so there’s no guarantee that Earth’s inhabitants, tens of thousands of years from now, would understand any of the writing systems currently in use. The meanings of visual signs also drift over time. The more whimsical “ray cat solution,” of genetically engineering cats to glow in the presence of radioactive material, is even less reliable.
A worker blows away salt in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in New Mexico (Photo by Joe Raedle)GETTY IMAGES
After brief flirtations with amusingly bad ideas including shooting nuclear waste into space, the consensus among nuclear scientists is that the best option for dealing with high-level nuclear waste is deep geological disposal. One of the International Atomic Energy Agency’s conditions for such a geological site is low groundwater content, which has been stable for at least tens of thousands of years, and geological stability, over millions of years. Thus, Japan, with its seismic instability, is unlikely to have any suitable candidates for deep geological disposal.
Like many countries, Japan is relying on interim storage of high-level waste while hoping that longer-term solutions will present themselves eventually. In fact, no country even has an operational deep geological repository for spent nuclear fuel. (The US has a deep disposal site in New Mexico for “transuranic” waste from nuclear weapons, which is long-lived and intermediate-level waste whose elements have higher numbers than uranium in the periodic table.)
It’s challenging to find a site that ticks all of the geological boxes (including relatively impermeable material with little risk of water infiltration), and thatisn’t politically controversial. To take two notable examples, communities in Nevada, US and Bure, France have hotly opposed plans to establish repositories. Given the history of environmental justice globally, it’s likely that any future locations approved for nuclear waste dumps will be found in poor areas.
Only one country, Finland, is even building a permanent spent-fuel repository. Even in Finland, however, it’s estimated that a license won’t be issued until 2024. Similar licenses for other European countries scouting out possible locations likely wouldn’t be available until 2050 in Germany and 2065 in the Czech Republic. And these countries are outnumbered by those that don’t even have an estimated timeframe for licensing, as they’re so far back in the process of searching for a site.
Preparing to move Chernobyl’s destroyed reactor no. 4 from its old sarcophagus (Photo by Brendan … [+]GETTY IMAGES
Strategies remain worryingly short-term, on a nuclear timescale. Chernobyl’s destroyed reactor no. 4, for instance, was encased in July 2019 in a massive steel “sarcophagus” that will only last 100 years. Not only will containers like this one fall short of the timescales needed for sufficient storage, but no country has allotted enough funds to cover nuclear waste disposal. In France and the US, according to the recently published World Nuclear Waste Report, the funding allocation only covers a third of the estimated costs. And the cost estimates that do exist rarely extend beyond several decades.
Essentially, we’re hoping that things will work out once future generations develop better technologies and find more funds to manage nuclear waste. It’s one of the most striking examples of the dangers of short-term thinking.
In a large bowl combine flour, sugar, and bicarbonate of soda
In a separate bowl combine all wet ingredients and stir to combine
Pour wet ingredients into dry and whisk until smooth
Heat frypan on setting 9. Melt butter in the pan. Add 1/4 cup cupfuls of mixture into the pan. Cook for 2-3 minutes on each side or until golden brown and cooked. Serve.
Heat frypan on setting 15. Add potatoes and cover with water. Cover with the lid. Simmer until potatoes are tender. Drain.
Heat frypan on setting 12. Add potatoes, oil, and mustard seeds. Season to taste with salt and pepper. Cook for 15 minutes or until potatoes are golden. Serve.
Heat oil in the frypan on setting 12. Add onion and cook for 2-3 minutes or until tender. Set aside.
In a large bowl combine onion, breadcrumbs, butter, thyme, parsley, lemon. Season with salt and pepper. Place mixture inside the cavity of the chicken. Tie wings together with kitchen twine.
Preheat frypan to setting 10. Place chicken in the pan. Cook for 1-2 minutes on each side or until golden. Cover with the lide. Reduce heat to setting 8. Cook for 1-1.5 hours or until cooked. Season to taste with salt and pepper.
The ocean circulation in the north Atlantic is likely to collapse sooner than expected as a result of climate change, causing further upheaval in weather patterns around the globe, new peer-reviewed scientific analysis finds.
The latest study of the currents or “conveyor belt” that carry warmer water upwards from the tropics concludes the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (Amoc) will shut down at some point between 2025 and 2095, with the 2050s most likely.
The University of Copenhagen researchers predicted the outcome with 95 per cent confidence in the paper published in the journal Nature Communications.
The findings by Copenhagen professors Peter Ditlevsen and Susanne Ditlevsen contrast with the view of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that Amoc is unlikely to collapse this century, and some scientists remain wary of departing from the IPCC’s predictions.
A collapse of Amoc, which includes the Gulf Stream stretching from Florida to north-western Europe, would produce pronounced cooling across the northern hemisphere, leading to stormier winters and drier summers in Europe.
Conversely, heat would intensify further south, as less warmth is transferred to temperate and polar latitudes, and there would be large changes in tropical rainfall and monsoons.
It is one of the most feared of the “tipping points” for the planet, or irreversible changes, that are threatened by global warming.
“I was surprised we found that the tipping point would come so soon and that we could constrain its timing so strongly to the next 70 years,” said Peter Ditlevsen. He said the IPCC models were “too conservative” and did not take into account early warning signals of instability reported more recently.
Stefan Rahmstorf, professor of ocean physics at Potsdam University and one of Europe’s leading climate scientists, said the growing body of science around the world’s ocean current systems showed a marked shift.
“The findings are in line with a couple of other studies in recent years suggesting that the Amoc tipping point is perhaps much closer than we previously thought. The evidence is mounting and is in my view alarming.”
Tim Lenton, one of the world’s foremost experts on tipping points and professor of climate science at Exeter university, noted the study had “made important improvements to the methods of providing early warning of a climate tipping point directly from data”.
“Once past the tipping point, the collapse of the Amoc would be irreversible,” Lenton said. “The collapse and its impacts will take time to unfold, but how long is uncertain,” he added.
Other climate scientists were more doubtful about the data and analytical methods used by the Copenhagen researchers.
“It is an interesting paper and emphasises Amoc collapse as a reason for concern,” said Richard Wood, head of the climate and oceans group at the UK Met Office Hadley Centre. “But I’m not abandoning the IPCC view, expressed with medium confidence, that it won’t collapse this century, though we do expect a weakening of the Amoc.”
Geological evidence suggests that during the last ice ages drastic changes in Atlantic circulation took place within a decade or two, but some climate models predict that it might take a century or so for the Amoc to halt completely under 21st-century circumstances. Even a partial shutdown would exacerbate the disruption caused by global warming.
Other worrying manifestations of global warming in the oceans include exceptionally high sea surface temperatures now being recorded around temperate regions of the northern hemisphere — as much as 5C above average off the east coast of Canada — while sea ice around Antarctica is at an all-time winter low. These are not directly related to changes in the Amoc.
The Ditlevsens — a brother and sister research partnership — said their results added to the urgency of global action to cut greenhouse gases. But Susanne Ditlevsen was not optimistic about the chances of avoiding an Amoc collapse.
“From what I see in the data it doesn’t look as though we can reverse it, unless there is a huge change in political views everywhere in the world, including China and the United States,” she said.
2 to 3 medium (20 cm), very ripe bananas peeled (about 1 1/4 to 1 1/2 cups mashed)
75g butter, unsalted or salted, melted
1/2 teaspoon baking soda (not baking powder)
1 pinch salt
3/4 cup (150g) sugar (1/2 cup if you would like it less sweet, 1 cup if more sweet)
1 large egg, beaten
1 teaspoon vanilla extract
1 1/2 cups (200g) all-purpose flour
Method
Preheat the oven and prepare the pan:Preheat the oven to 175°C, and butter an 20cm x 10cm loaf pan.
Mash the bananas and add the butter:In a mixing bowl, mash the ripe bananas with a fork until completely smooth. Stir the melted butter into the mashed bananas.
Mix in the remaining ingredients:Mix in the baking soda and salt. Stir in the sugar, beaten egg, and vanilla extract. Mix in the flour.
Bake the bread:Pour the batter into your prepared loaf pan.
Bake for 55 to 65 minutes at 175°C, or until a toothpick or wooden skewer inserted into the center comes out clean. A few dry crumbs are okay; streaks of wet batter are not. If the outside of the loaf is browned but the center is still wet, loosely tent the loaf with foil and continue baking until the loaf is fully baked.
Cool and serve:Remove from oven and let cool in the pan for a few minutes. Then remove the banana bread from the pan and let cool completely before serving. Slice and serve. (A bread knife helps to make slices that aren’t crumbly.)Wrapped well, the banana bread will keep at room temperature for 4 days. For longer storage, refrigerate the loaf up to 5 days, or freeze it.